Autobiography
The
Limits of Autobiography: Trauma and Testimony by Leigh Gilmore (Paperback)
(Cornell University Press) Memoirs in which trauma takes a major--or the
major--role challenge the limits of autobiography. Leigh Gilmore presents a
series of "limit-cases"--texts that combine elements of autobiography, fiction,
biography, history, and theory while representing trauma and the self--and
demonstrates how and why their authors swerve from the formal constraints of
autobiography when the representation of trauma coincides with
self-representation. Gilmore maintains that conflicting demands on both the self
and narrative may prompt formal experimentation by such writers and lead to
texts that are not, strictly speaking, autobiography, but are nonetheless deeply
engaged with its central concerns.
In astute and compelling readings of texts by Michel Foucault, Louis Althusser,
Dorothy Allison, Mikal Gilmore, Jamaica Kincaid, and Jeanette Winterson, Gilmore
explores how each of them poses the questions, "How have I lived? How will I
live?" in relation to the social and psychic forms within which trauma emerges.
Challenging the very boundaries of autobiography as well as trauma, these
stories are not told in conventional ways: the writers testify to how
self-representation and the representation of trauma grow beyond simple causes
and effects, exceed their duration in time, and connect to other forms of
historical, familial, and personal pain. In their movement from an overtly
testimonial form to one that draws on legal as well as literary knowledge, such
texts produce an alternative means of confronting kinship, violence, and
self-representation.
Leigh Gilmore is Associate Professor of English at The Ohio State University.
She is the author of
Autobiographics: A Feminist Theory of Self-Representation.
Narrative and Identity: Studies in Autobiography, Self and Culture by
Jens Brockmeier, Donal A. Carbaugh (Studies in Narrative, Volume 1: John
Benjamins) The focus of this book and
the series is constructing human identity. Editor’s summary: This
theoretical landscape of narrative study provides a background upon which the
scope of the essays presented in this volume can be located. The essays included
here set out to focus on one particular issue: the relationship between
narrative and human identity, and the question of how we construct what we call
our lives and how we create ourselves in the process. All authors of this volume
share the conviction that the question of what type of construction is at stake
here, can neither be separated from the question of what type of identity is
being created in this construction, nor isolated from the question of the
cultural and historical context of this construction. They also share the
assumption that these questions are productively engaged from the perspective of
narrative. Moreover, some of the papers in this book set out to show that such a
complex and fleeting construction as human identity‑the self in time ‑ can only
exist as a narrative construction. Without the narrative fabric, it seems
difficult to even think of human temporality and historicity at all.
The study of narrative, thus, appears to be not just one sub‑discipline among
others, one that is particularly helpful for our understanding of the twists and
turns of human identity. There is a deeper, philosophical point about the
relation between narrative and identity. We believe the essays of this volume
demonstrate that narrative proves to be a supremely appropriate means for the
exploration of the self or, more precisely, the construction of selves in
cultural contexts of time and space. What these studies ultimately suggest is
that the very idea of human identity ‑ perhaps we can even say, the very
possibility of human identity‑ is tied to the very notion of narrative and
narrativity.
We have divided the papers of this volume into three parts. The first part
introduces a number of theoretical perspectives on the problem of narrative and
self-construction. The chapters of the second part explore particular life
stories in their cultural contexts, presenting the distinct worlds of a
Blackfeet man, a woman who survived breast cancer, and the fictional and real
heroes of collective American identity narratives. In the third part, essays
focus on specific issues, empirical and theoretical, of autobiographical memory
and narrative identity, studying self-accounts (fictional and non‑fictional) by
a composer, a scientist and philosopher, writers, and painters. A summary
commentary sets out to sketch a little colloquium among the authors, outlining
several questions for further inquiry.
In the first chapter of the first part, Jerome Bruner offers a view of the
autobiographical process as a process of narrative self‑making. Like all other
aspects of "worldmaking"‑a notion Bruner borrows from philosopher Nelson
Goodman‑self‑making (or "life‑making") depends heavily upon the symbolic system
in which it is conducted, its opportunities and constraints. Bruner explores
these symbolic systems as cultural constructions, focusing especially on the
construction of autobiographical life narratives. He lists a number of features
that characterise modern life stories, discussing several examples drawn from
natural and literary autobiographies. Against this backdrop, Bruner brings to
the fore a strange contradiction: While the self is regarded, in Western
ideology, as the most private aspect of our being, it turns out on closer
inspection to be highly social and discursively negotiable. To study
autobiographies, in this view, involves not only examining the cultural
construction of personal identity, but also the construction of one's social
culture.
All studies of this book draw heavily upon particular notions of narrative.
Brockmeier and Harre's chapter can be read as an introduction into narrative as
a new model for the human sciences. They argue that the increasing interest in
the study of narrative and its cultural contexts reflects the emergence of
another strand of postpositivist method in the social sciences. Drawing on
socio‑ and psycholinguistics as well as on literary and philosophical studies,
Brockmeier and Harre offer a working definition of narrative that differentiates
it from other patterns of discourse. In discussing various examples, they
highlight some of the qualities that have made the study of narrative such a
productive approach. But they also identify some theoretical difficulties and
possible dangers of which, they believe, students of narrative should be aware.
The understanding of narrative that is outlined in this essay lays a strong
emphasis on its fleeting character and its particular discursive embededness,
qualities, the authors argue, that make it particularly appropriate for
investigating the dynamic patterns of human identity.
In his chapter, Rom Harre explores how narrative can
structure both singularities and multiplicities of self. His central thesis
builds upon a notion of the self as three‑fold: "self‑1" being a context of
perception, "self‑2" being a context of reflection, and "self‑3" being a context
of social interaction. Harre points out that "self‑1" and "self‑2" are generally
singular, with "self‑3" being generally plural. These ideas are being applied to
the analysis of two prominent narratives about humans and human identities: One
conceives of persons as neuro‑material entities, the other understands persons
as psycho‑moral actors. Examining the limitations of both views, Harre proposes
their integration within a tool‑task narrative frame.
In their study, Freeman and Brockmeier claim that one's identity, insofar as it
is tied to the interpretive appraisal of one's personal past as it takes place
in autobiographical narrative, is inseparable from normative ideas of what a
life is, or is supposed to be, if it is lived well. They call these ideas
conceptions of the "good life", drawing attention to the fact that the narrative
construction of identity not only has a psychological, social, and aesthetic
dimension, but also an ethical one. In discussing distinct cultural and
historical genres of life narratives from Greek Antiquity, Christianity,
Modernity, and Postmodernity, the essay suggests that, whatever the specific
form of the autobiographical process, it will inevitably be conditioned by some
notion of narrative integrity. This notion unavoidably encompasses both an
aesthetic and an ethical dimension. The authors`argue that cultural ideas of the
"good life" will affect the degree of narrative integrity that inheres in the
stories people tell about their lives and, ultimately, in their identities.
Donal Carbaugh's chapter presents an ethnographic narrative that is based upon
the analysis of several oral texts. The main concerns of his study are to show
how the oral texts are embedded in a specific cultural meaning system, and how
such narrative can be understood and analyzed in culturally sensitive ways.
Carbaugh's analyses are focused primarily upon a narrative told by a Blackfeet,
Native American man, Rising Wolf. The study points out how the particular event
in which Rising Wolf's story was told influences its structure; how that
structure implies a particular view of history, memory, and identity; and how
the deeper meanings and significance of that structure are dependent not only
upon physical places, but also upon a system of cultural discourse that includes
ritual, myth, and social drama. As the narrative activates this system of
expression, it demonstrates how intercultural dynamics and cultural
preservation, as well as resistance, can be managed today by traditional
Blackfeet people.
Carol Fleisher Feldman begins her exploration of group‑defining stories by noting a key difference between narratives that students tell about their work in New York theatre groups. She wondered how dramatically different stories could be told about seemingly similar life worlds. Her analysis treats narratives as cultural patterns that can be conceived of as cognitive genres for creating and interpreting experiences. The same is true, she argues, for narratives of extended cultural communities such as nations. National identity narratives are a special case of a "group defining story". By examining historical themes in American national narratives, from the plots of the romance and the quest, she proposes several properties of national identity narratives. Feldman's essay shows that national identity narratives, like all group narrative, can provide basic forms through which personal autobiographies gain shape and meaning.
Kristin Langellier examines a series of narratives told by
a ten‑year survivor of breast cancer. During her ordeal, the survivor, Rhea, has
confronted several potent cultural events, in addition to the cancer, radiation
treatments, and surgery‑ all of them, as the essay points out, are deeply
embedded in cultural discourses of gender and ethnicity. Rhea responded, in
part, by getting a tattoo on her mastectomy scar, writing over the "writings" of
cancer and surgery. Langellier's chapter analyzes Rhea's story as a "performance
of identity" that moves from the lack of agency in getting breast cancer to the
forceful agency of`getting a tattoo on her scar. Five segments of Rhea's account
are transcribed and analyzed for their individual and cultural meanings,
features of performance, and verbal strategies. Langellier argues that Rhea's
narrative performance of identity holds transformative potential for the
cultural discourses of tattoo and breast cancer.
Jerome Sehulster investigates the "historical truth" and
"narrative truth" of an important episode in Richard Wagner's autobiography. In
his Mein Leben (My Life), the composer
recounts a wonderful creative "vision" experienced at La Spezia, Italy, in early
September 1853. Ever since, Wagner's vision has been referred to as a pivotal
event in the extended drama of the creation of his epic four opera cycle,
Der Ring des Nibelungen. Examining Wagners' autobiographical writings,
letters, and other historical documents, Sehulster finds amazing discrepancies
and contradictions. A detailed analysis of the account of Wagner and other
contemporary documents leads to the conclusion that Wagner invented and
elaborated the autobiographical account of the vision to present himself, in
hindsight, to others as the Genius and Artist, as described by philosopher
Arthur Schopenhauer, whose work Wagner encountered a year after La Spezia.
However, Sehulster argues, the reinterpretation or even "rewriting" of an
autobiographical experience does not necessarily lack "narrative truth". The
account of the vision, like many other accounts in
Mein Leben, is far less a historical document than a mythical narrative of
self presentation. It is part of Wagner's personal myth, which supports a major
component of his identity.
In his study on Jean Piaget's self accounts, Jacques Vonehe deals with a
particularly interesting case of multiple autobiographical identities. The
famous Swiss psychologist wrote, during his long life, several life narratives.
In each of them he presented himself in different ways and on different scenes
to different audiences. The comparison among these different life narratives is
revealing. In all of his autobiographies, as the study shows, Piaget is both the
same and different: The facts are the same, the anecdotes are similar, but the
outcome is entirely different. Autobiography, for Vonehe, is an enormously
flexible genre of Selbstdarstellung (self presentation). It varies according to the
target audience in function of which the plot of a life and an identity is
fashioned. Focusing on two wide‑spread autobiographies of Piaget, Voneche aims
at pointing out the different interactions among actor, scene, plot, and
audience. Facing different scenes and cultural target‑audiences, Piaget changes
hats and intellectual identities. This is all the more striking, since the
"scientific" Piaget presented himself as a developmental theorist for whom
individual development is the explanatory factor in epistemology and psychology.
Brockmeier's essay tackles three themes. First, it raises the problem of reference in autobiography: Who is the author, the teller of the story, and who is the self behind or in this discourse? Is there a self, or one self, at all? Second, it examines the commonsense view that the (auto)biographical gestalt of a life is circumscribed by a natural development from the beginning to the end. This view is closely associated with what Brockmeier calls the "retrospective teleology" of life narratives, the fact that a life, if told in hindsight, seems to have been lived towards a goal, a telos. The third theme is the vision of time and temporality that emerges in autobiographical narrative. The authors argue that human identity construction is essentially the construction of a particular mode of time, "autobiographical time", the time of one's life. To explain his arguments, he discusses the "visual narratives" of paintings, reading examples of portraiture as life narratives. In doing so, the essay makes the point that the history of art since the Renaissance offers a genre of (auto)biographical painting that is not only a fascinating form of pictorial life narrative, but also allows for insights into the nature of the autobiographical process.
In the final chapter, Mark Freeman offers a critical reading and summary discussion of the preceding chapters. He identifies four basic dimensions that are involved in the various explorations into the relationship between narrative and identity presented in this volume: the historical, cultural, rhetorical, and experiential or poetic dimension. In focusing on some key concepts that emerge from the discussion of these dimensions ‑ "autobiographical consciousness", "narrative imagination", and "narrative connectedness" ‑ Freeman suggests seeing the identity of the self as a unique narrative style, a style embodied in our life narratives. Taking this idea one step farther, he argues that there is a form of "literariness" that is in a distinct sense built into the fabric of life. Viewed in this way, the question of identity and narrative merges into the question of life and narrative. In fact, as Freeman concludes, we might speak of the poetic dimension not only of the narrative construction of identity, as it takes place in autobiographical narrative, but of experience itself.
insert content here