Indian Esoteric Buddhism by Ronald M. Davidson (Columbia University Press) (Paperback)
provides a resourceful and original historical study of Indian Esoteric Buddhism
which is likely to become a standard reference for years to come. This
pioneering effort is likely to raise some controversy and is not likely to have
a ready audience among the gaggle of Buddhist devotees, as it deals with
Buddhist evidence critically and not devotionally, seeking historical
plausibility rather than mythic certainty. However for the critically informed
Buddhist this work will prove enlightening for suggesting the social and
political conditions in which the origins of the Tantric movement evolved in
early medieval
The keen originality of the volume is the author’s use of primary documents,
often translated into English for the first time from Sanskrit, Prakrit, and
Bengali, his use of Buddhist and non-Buddhist sources, iconographic and
archeological evidence, extensive fieldwork in India and Pakistan, and current
historical and religious scholarship to create a new level of analytic
appreciation of early medieval Indian society. Davidson sketches the intricate
history of
Davidson applies these considerations to the emergence of
new and radical strains in Indian Buddhism and Hinduism during this long and
turbulent period. He compellingly shows that disruption of the great monastic
institutions, the loss of the order of nuns leading to their marginalization in
public worship set up the conditions for the
development personal forms of religiosity to emerge. Some of these, that we now
recognize as Tantric was to have a great future outside of
One of Davidson strategies is to note the similar trends
appearing in Hinduism around the same time. He contends that the esoteric
traditions had a mutuality of influenced some of which he suggests but in no way
exhausts. Davidson's own investigations popular religion in modern
All in all, I found
Indian Esoteric Buddhism absorbing reading though parts were turgid and not
easy to follow. The emergence of new religious forms is often explained from
within the religious framework. But hard and fast sectarian identifications is
not the living experience of populations of multiple religious orientations.
That religious change is primary social rather than sectarian loosens the grip
of the unconscious Christendom upon our thinking about religious developments in
other historic contexts. In sum this study is required for a critical
understanding of the historic origins of
Indian Esoteric Buddhism.
insert content here