Indigenous Religions: A Companion edited by Graham Harvey
(Cassell Academic)
Readings in Indigenous Religions edited by Graham Harvey (Continuum) One
story is never enough. We do not gain full understanding, let alone wisdom, the
first time we hear or do something - however powerful it or our engagement might
be. We might not even remember something we are told or observe only once.
Certainly we are unlikely to appreciate all the nuances of one telling or
performing. Even performing in a play or telling a story might not alert us to
all the possibilities and potentialities that ripple outwards, subtly or
dramatically affecting other hearers or performers or tellers of tales. In one
sense, this book is a sequel to a collection of articles by gifted scholars
which I was privileged to edit (Harvey 2000). In another sense this is a
companion volume, chapters here engaging in potent dialogue with chapters in
the previous book. Yet again, parts of this book are foundational - sometimes
even ancestral - to the other, as for example where they inspired or authorized
chapters in the other work.
This
collection of Readings includes some `classic' texts in the study of indigenous
religions. It also contains more recent scholarly works that not only inform
about indigenous religions but, more importantly - and more interestingly -
elucidate ways of knowing and researching. These Readings are intended to widen
and deepen debates initiated or developed in Indigenous Religions: A Companion,
and important in the study of indigenous and other religions. Such debates are
not only concerned with descriptive detail, but also with improving
methodologies by which the meanings and implications of such descriptions might
be better understood and discussed. These Readings exemplify recent
developments and suggest further possibilities. The study of indigenous
religions is no longer the preserve of one academic discipline, nor is it
undertaken by one methodology. Thus, not all the scholarly writing here arises
within the study of religions, but all of it is of value in that discipline.
Meanwhile,
recent methodological developments intersect with the increasing availability of
significant indigenous writings which enrich engagement, for example, by
providing narratives more like `traditional' modes of discourse or performance.
Religion, like music, seduces those who would stand back and observe at a
distance, tempts them to tap their feet and hum along. Some get drawn in and
find themselves dancing to the rhythm, responding with body, mind, and soul.
Others withdraw only to find themselves whistling a refrain later. This is how
it should be, how it always should have been. Religious activities, like music,
expect vigorous and passionate involvement, and make disengagement equivalent to
misunderstanding. Just as a previous project (Ralls MacLeod and Harvey 2001)
included a CD as an attempt to provoke a somewhat more sensitive and sensual
engagement, so this book includes two excerpts from indigenous creative
fiction.
There are,
of course, plenty of other texts that might have been included or that might be
vital to the study of indigenous religions. Many of these are referred to in
chapters or the editorial notes that preface them.
Structure
and themes
Indigenous
Religions: A Companion is divided into three parts entitled Persons, Powers and
Gifts. These relate to the outworking of `existential postulates' or principles
that inform many (if not all) indigenous worldviews, and `highlight the
vitality of human expressiveness' (Morrison 1992: 202-3). Those generative
principles (Person, Power, Gift) have been of varying significance for, and the
subject of varying degrees of attention by, academics. The fact that they are
integral to one another in the formation of particular lifeways made it
difficult to decide where to place each chapter in the previous volume. It also
requires readers to make connections across the (as always) permeable boundaries
implied by the structure. The present volume of Readings adds a further layer of
complexity by encouraging readers to see the connections between material in
two volumes. Further notes on how that might be done are offered below.
While some
of the chapters here reflect on the concepts Person, Power, Gift in relation to
particular indigenous worldviews and lifeways, a new set of themes arises from
them to structure this book. Chapters are divided into four parts labelled
Ontology, Performance, Knowledge, Land. Clearly these are only signposts to one
matter that is central to the chapters within each section. For example, since
persons are required to perform ceremonies in particular places, known in
particular ways, so it should be obvious that chapters discussing the
construction of persons might discuss not only Ontology but also Performance,
Knowledge and/or Land. Similarly, to perform is to engage in relationship and
to know one's place in the scheme of things. And so on. It is difficult to know,
after the fact, whether any particular chapter was included because it focuses
on a particular theme or whether the themes became clear only as the chapters
were placed side by side. This difficulty reinforces the arbitrary nature of the
boundaries suggested by the division of the book into four parts. However, just
so long as readers recognize these facts, we can proceed by considering matters
to which the signposts point. (More detailed introductions to the significance
of each chapter are provided in linked introductory notes.)
Part I
includes four chapters under the general heading `Ontology'. These provide four
different perspectives - neither necessarily opposing nor agreeing with one
another - on the construction of persons, communities, and/or cosmos in
particular indigenous societies. In doing so they are also vital to the
reconsideration of the ontology or meaning of `religion' as an academic concept
and as lived reality. Does `religion' refer to a discrete aspect of life in
which people internalize ideas (as `beliefs' or `knowledge') relevant to some
putative otherworldly realm? Does the discourse of religion require use of words
like `supernatural' or `spiritual' to refer to a realm essentially separate from
the `mundane' realm of everyday life? Or is religion a facet of the continuously
ongoing construction of persons and personal (whether individual or dividual)
identity? Of course, these are not absolute alternatives: even for those
religionists for whom the `natural' is of less religious significance than the
`supernatural', religion is still about the construction of relationships and
relational persons. However, it is certainly true that the academic study of
religions has been skewed by the centrality of theological discourse about
belief, spirituality, and the divine origins of grace (or Gift). In various
ways these four chapters ground attention to indigenous worldviews in the
relational nexus of particular lifeways and their daily lived realities.
Part II
pays greater attention to religious activities under the heading of Performance.
In a broad sense everything we do is performance. The identification of
religious performance as a special category - ritual - has generated
considerable debate, but little of it has been as exciting as recent moves to
reconnect such activities with other forms of performance. The first chapter
bridges the divide between this and the previous part. The balance between
description, reflection, and theorizing varies in and between the five chapters
(and might be further energized by reference to other works or chapters by the
authors). The performances with which these chapters engage include divination,
healing, world- and kinshiprenewal (perhaps the same thing), shamanry, and
magic. These bald labels cannot do justice to the richness of the debate, or to
the careful critical
reflection
on terms that might be either misleadingly alien or valuable in scholarly but
not local communities. Clearly there is much to debate here.
Part III
concerns indigenous knowledges. Partly in order to demonstrate the diversity of
modes in which knowledges are relevant (although, even so, only a small sample
of the possibilities are evident here), four of the six chapters relate to Maori
knowledge. Traditional knowledge informs contemporary oratory, relationships
(including attempts to heal them), literature, and legislation. The latter is
represented by copies of the Treaty upon which present-day political, economic,
and social relationships are enabled and constrained in New Zealand. However, it
is prefaced by the previous attempted Declaration of Independence to demonstrate
that indigenous knowledge demands sovereign expressions of self-presentation and
self-worth. The theme is continued by the inclusion of a programmatic
elaboration of a contemporary indigenous vision or ideology. The section
concludes with another kind of vision, not only because it relates to Aboriginal
(and Euro-) Australia, but also because it pays further attention to the
expression and construction of indigenous knowledge in art.
Part IV may
be brief, containing only two chapters, but it is of considerable importance.
Discussions of land - variously construed as ecology, environment, subsistence,
sovereignty, cosmology, geomentality, and others - have generated a vast
literature. The very language of `indigeneity' demands attentive consideration
of land. In no way is it implied that the chapters included here are sufficient
or even representative of all that might be said. They certainly raise some
important issues, and they point beyond themselves not only to the important
books from which they are extracted, but also to other important books that they
cite. And there is more.
Both
chapters pay attention to the relationships of power inherent in any discourse
about land. Even when neighbouring indigenous peoples meet, the sovereignty and
ecology of living in places can be contentious. But, far and above such fraught
dynamics, the world is now thoroughly colonized following European expansion. It
is further permeated by `globalization'. In recent years, academia has faced up
to the polemics inherent in its ancestral assertions of `objectivity'. Realizing
that this too is a construction of relationship - and one that has been central
to colonization - has inspired a wealth of debate about more respectful and more
engaged means of research and discourse. In many ways, it is these new moves in
academia that are of most importance in the various chapters included in this
book. While each chapter can be read for what it says about facets of indigenous
religiosity, a central motive for inclusion has been their various contributions
to the de- and re-construction of academia.
Religious Reading: The Place of Reading in the Practice of Religion by Paul J. Griffiths (Oxford University Press) What social conditions and intellectual practices are necessary in order for religious cultures to flourish? Paul Griffiths finds the answer in "religious reading"‑ the kind of reading in which a religious believer allows his or her mind to be furnished and his or her heart instructed by a sacred text, understood in the light of an authoritative tradition. Memorization and recitation, lectio divina, legal and exegetical commentary, scholasticism, and a host of related practices fall under this rubric. Griffiths offers two case studies of religious reading, focusing on pedagogical practices and the use of literacy. The first considers four Sanskrit Buddhist commentaries and anthologies of ancient India. The second chooses four writings of the Church Fathers of Roman Africa. In each case, Griffiths attempts to show what religious reading was like‑what its tools were, what genres it produced, how it was donein this place and time.
In examining and analyzing these practices, Griffiths develops a picture of the intellectual and moral commitments involved in being a religious person. Religion, in his view, is not just a coloration of human experience or merely the "depth dimension" of human culture. It is something very specific and very demanding. It entails obligations, including the obligation to submit one's own conscience and sensibilities to a rule of faith found in a particular community and a particular authoritative tradition. It requires information (about key doctrines and symbols) and skill (for the competent use of religious texts, artifacts, and practices). Griffiths favorably contrasts the practices and pedagogies of traditional religious cultures with those of our own fragmented and secularized culture and insists that religious reading should be preserved. He concludes with the controversial proposal that the modern university should make room for traditional scholastics.
Paul J. Griffiths is Professor of the Philosophy of Religion in the University of Chicago's Divinity School. Born in England, he was educated first in theology and then in Sanskrit and Indian philosophy at Oxford University. Having lived in the United States since 1980, he has studied Buddhism at the University of Wisconsin and has taught at the University of Notre Dame.
insert content here
insert content here