The Real Drug Abusers by Fred Leavitt
(Rowman & Littlefield), with a
Ph.D. in psychopharmacology and 20 years of service at
The news media thrive on lurid reports of drug-related
dissolution and degradation. Readers and viewers avidly follow sensational
stories about pushers soliciting junior high school children, strung-out
addicts mugging people and terrorizing businesses, girls and young women turning
to prostitution to support their habits, police officers being corrupted by the
lure of easy money, informants turning on friends and relatives, gangs killing
each other in wars over drug territory, and entire neighborhoods being destroyed
while kingpins live in island villas with fleets of luxury cars and pleasure
craft. But media reports often go well beyond what the facts about drugs
warrant. The media are concerned more with ratings than accuracy, and
sensationalized stories sell. The stories draw large audiences, whereas
original research findings, described in technical language and published in
specialized journals with limited readership, have little direct influence on
public opinion.
Public opinion is also shaped by politicians, bureaucrats
working within government agencies, and representatives from drug company
marketing departments. They often refer to research findings and comment on
isolated incidents involving drugs, but their pronouncements too often reflect
vested interests rather than dedication to the truth. Nevertheless, they are
influential and help keep the public woefully misinformed about the nature of
drug abuse. For example, the view that drug addicts arc qualitatively different
from other people is entrenched in the public consciousness despite there being
little support from research in biochemistry, neuroscience, psychology,
sociology, or anthropology.
Societies differ in
their strategies for making beneficial drugs available and restricting the use
of harmful drugs. All societies have unique sets of behavioral norms,
methods for discouraging deviation from the norms, and attitudes toward
violators. Although drug abuse cuts across socioeconomic boundaries, certain
groups—the mentally ill, the homeless, and people who do not receive proper
medical care, who lack skills or motivation to find meaningful work, and who
have been or merely feel oppressed—are especially vulnerable to relying on
drugs in attempts to cope. Disparities in education, wealth, and power occur in
all societies, but attitudes toward people at the lower end of the continuum
differ greatly. Responses to both licit and illicit drugs, the likelihood that
casual use will turn into addiction, and the harms caused by addiction depend
to a great extent on these cultural factors.
The Molecule Is Not
the Message. Advertisements directed at both doctors and laypersons suggest
that drug actions depend almost exclusively on molecular structure. Authors
describe effects in minute detail: “LSD, 1966, a presumptuous little pill,
causes dilated pupils, increased heart rate, and vivid hallucinations of used
car salesmen.” The authors make subtle distinctions between structurally similar
molecules, disregarding the fact that even experienced users cannot discriminate
between heroin and morphine or between injected amphetamine and cocaine. They
consider humans passive respondents, little different from litmus paper or other
forms of laboratory apparatus. Just as litmus paper reliably changes color if
dipped into an acidic substance, human neurons change in reliable ways following
exposure to certain drugs. But this perspective ignores the fact that changes in
brain chemistry depend on many factors and are not the sole determinants of how
recipients respond to drugs. People’s expectations affect their responses to
all experiences. Consider two studies by Martin Orne that do not involve drugs:
Expectations can be manipulated so that sugar pills (placebos) affect recipients as though they are powerful drugs. Expectations induced by living in a particular society shape responses to real drugs. Among these The Real Drug Abusers discusses 1) Alcohol, 2) Caffeine, 3) LSD, and 4) Marijuana.
Societal norms and
laws related to drugs have widespread ramifications. Societal norms and laws
have impacts that extend far beyond shaping the responses of drug users. They
influence long-range prospects of users of illegal drugs, treatments of those in
need of medical drugs, and people’s general attitudes toward seeking
alternatives to medical drugs and experimenting with recreational ones. The
norms and laws affect safety, taxes, and quality of life for most citizens.
Therefore, they should be frequently reevaluated.
Drug abuse—an
expanded perspective. Drug abuse, narrowly conceived, is any use of illicit
substances or excessive use of legal ones. That is how government agencies
define the term. But, though proscribed personal use makes headlines and gets
people sent to prison, several less-publicized activities involving drugs cause
great harm to the general public. Chapters of
The Real Drug Abusers discuss examples from each of the following
categories:
The various categories of abuse can be traced to three types of causes: 1) Human error, 2) Lack of information, misinformation, and disinformation, and 3) Money. Leavitt discusses each of these in detail.
Each of the chapters is headed with an assertion about one
aspect of drug abuse. The text provides evidence and argument for the assertion.
The Real Drug Abusers is a must
read for anyone who cares to sort out, in detail, what is, in fact, known about
drug use and misuse and what is not. Be warned, however, side effects of reading
this book include paranoia.
insert content here